I got a pile of books from Nat
that aren't related to politics or history. Something a little
less dry to enjoy. Of course, they were all Chuck Palahniuk books
so we'll see how they affect my brain. In fact, when I think
about it I realize that it's a long way from the non-fiction that
I've been feeding myself recently.
I think that I'm finally ready to talk about last week's attack.
I feel like I have processed it enough to know how I really feel
about it.
The most interesting thing in the way that it's affected me is the
fact that it's something that I haven't just buried my head in the
sand to avoid. In fact I expect that it's something that I will
carry with me for the rest of my life. And, as part of that
acceptance, I think that's OK. It's important to be reminded of
how precious life is and how it can change or be lost in an
instant. It gives rise to the idea that you should treasure and
make good use of the life that you have left because maybe
tomorrow it will be gone.
I know that for myself I don't want to be in a position where at
the end of my life that I have major regrets. I don't mean the
kind of regret where you say "...but I never saw
Paris..." - I mean the kind where you know that you didn't
live your life with enough passion, that you didn't love hard
enough and that you didn't stand up for the things that you
believe in and make yourself heard. Those are the kinds of
regrets that I think that I would find most disturbing and are the
ones that I am trying hardest to avoid.
So I guess that aside from that drive to move forward and live my
life much as I did before what else have I learned? Well, it's a
constant reminder of what real grief and empathy is like. I
didn't know anyone personally that died in the attack of but I
still feel sad for everyone who lost their lives. That's empathy.
I feel even sadder for those who were close to them and now have
to go on living without them. That bothers me more than anything;
that sense of loss that thousands of people are feeling at once.
Death is all around us, waiting for every one of us to enter her
arms. We shall all do so one day. What we really need to do,
every one of us, is to make sure that we have lived our lives day
to day in a manner in which we can respect ourselves when that
time comes.
I'm also very concerned that Justice is done in the names of the
victims of the attack. And I'm talking about Justice, not
Revenge. I'm convinved that the one thing that this country a
great country, above all other reasons is Rule of Law. And you
can't have Rule of Law without Justice. You have to have a system
that is as fair and as equitable as possible. It's a sign of a
civilization in which the participants have respect for one
another. And when you have mutual respect, you have peace and
prosperity.
My concern is that by calling this a War that we don't have to use
our system of justice to administer punishment, as we should be.
That we don't have to use the same rules that we apply to
ourselves. Instead the decision to do so is made outside of the
courts, outside of the power of the people. This would be
revenge, grudge killings, not Justice. By using rhetoric around
this tragedy that includes the word 'War' it means that we give
unlimited latitude to our Commander-in-Chief do what our courts
should be doing.
And, ideology aside and speaking strictly from a practical
perspective, I suspect that reacting with military force would
make the entire problem worse, not better. If the largely islamic
countries in the middle east feel that we are exacting our revenge
on the people at the cost of their national sovereignty it's
likely to breed more radicals, more people that feel that a holy
war is a good idea against the US. This would be bad for both
parties involved. I feel that cooler heads must prevail or we are
facing a situation where even more innocent, peace loving people
will be harmed or killed.
If we do decide to invade one of the countries in the middle east
in order to extract those that we feel are guilty, what will the
cost be? I'm not just talking about the lives of the people who
have to carry out that invasion, I'm talking about the cost of the
lives of those who are innocent in the country that's invaded.
When we're talking about the people responsible we're talking
about individual people and small groups who are carrying out
these terror attacks, not heads of state.
And what about the cost to our own society? What about the cost
to our own way of life? Can we truly stand with our heads held
high in the world community and say that we live by our own rules?
That we are mature enough to administer Justice to everyone
equally? What happens as individuals when we have to face our
neighbors over the mythical picket fence? Can we have an honest
discussion knowing that that we have supported a method of justice
that we would ask to be applied to ourselves?
If we have to use the military to extract those who are
responsible and bring them to justice here in this country, that's
OK with me. As long as justice is administered here in this
country and not on the battlefield which may include unnumbered
innocent lives, listed as 'collateral damage.'
I also know that until that day comes that the military is a
necessary, even welcome tool to every nation. To not have and not
fully support a military is a folly. It's the question of how you
use it that shows what the true character of a nation is. I hope
that we prove that we are the kinds of people that the world can
look up to in the way that we use ours, even in the face of
unbelievable temptation to inflict damage on the lives of the
people in other nations of the world as our own were so damaged.
We need to understand that when dealing with this issue that love
and justice are the two most powerful weapons in our arsenal.
Those are the tools that will win this 'War.' They are the only
tools that we have that gives us a future of peace in which the
members of the world community, from states to individuals, can
look on each other with mutual respect and a world of peace.
Back to reality, I haven't seen a lot of discourse on this subject
in the mass media where a vast majority of Americans still get
their news. CNN has this running title 'America's New War' which
makes me quite sad. They don't even leave out the chance that
this will be handled in a more sane manner. In fact, the cynic in
my wouldn't be surprised if they weren't hoping for military
action. It would certainly boost their ratings even higher.