January 28th, 2004
1:37pm: Rollerball was a terrible movie.

It's not like shaver didn't warn me or anything. It's just that I can't resist sometimes.

Last Sunday I had my first instrument flight that included actually flying in a real live airplane. There was an airmet for turbulence and I have to say the aviation weather service didn't disappoint. It was pretty bumpy and poor shona would have been terrified if she had come along for the ride.

We flew the VOR RWY 23 approach into bedford and I did quite well on that one, all things considered. I was having problems maintaining a constant altitude, some of which was due to the turbulence but had more to do with my apparently inability to use the trim wheel on that particular day. From there, I was vectored around via ATC and got set up for the ILS RWY 29 approach also into bedford. That also went relatively well, except that I had trouble following the glide path down for similar trim reasons. At about 400 feet above the ground (200 feet lower than the MDA) my instructor had me remove the hood and I was right on target. It was quite nice to be able to see that. I'm just looking forward to the day when we can do that in real clouds. However, given the current weather, that's going to be quice some time from now. From there, a nice landing and we were done for the day.

Major stumbling points included: occasional fixation and ommision. Managing the workload while maintaining a scan (changing to the approach plate from VOR 23 to ILS 29 took about 30 seconds, which is an eternity.) Thinking about my descent rate on the ILS approach and translating that into what was happening on the glide slope and how it should have told me something about my actual ground speed. Failed to use my 5 Ts a lot of places.

Positive points: I handled the 40 knot winds that were basically off my wing on the VOR approach quite well. Managed to stay basically on target most of the way down. Tracked each of the altitude changes as required as well as keeping awareness of my MDA and where I was in relation to it. Also managed to keep ahead of the plane in the sense that I remembered to tune in the right radio frequencies ahead of time.

Did I mention it was cold that day? I mean, really cold. I took my glove off during the preflight and it was almost numb in about 15 seconds. But I managed to get some flying in, and that was good.

January 26th, 2004
11:35am: Damn the man.

Everyone should stop and take the time to read this article, even the non-geeks.

January 22nd, 2004
2:49pm: I blame bz.

An excellent little article on framing. I tend to think about these things in most conversations I have and especially when I'm dealing with anything coming out of the media. Many times it's not the answer that's important, it's the question. People who take polls have known this for years, and can change the results based on the language that is used when taking the poll. People generally don't know when you've changed the context of a conversation but there are people out there who are completely immune to the entire practice. For example:

<blizzard> %ifarch i386
<blizzard> CC=gcc296 CXX=g++296
<blizzard> %endif
<blizzard> BUILD_OFFICIAL=1 MOZILLA_OFFICIAL=1 \
<blizzard> this is me crying
<boc> WARNING: PARENTAL DISCRETION IS ADVISED

8:09pm: haha made you look

Does this look familar to anyone else?

January 21st, 2004
1:01pm: I blame alecf.

Right now I'm trying to backport galeon 1.2.7 to Mozilla 1.6. Don't ask why. It's not that much fun as there have been some signifigant changes to the charset manager interface as well as some other small changes. Apparently, a lot of galeon still uses nsXPComFactory.h and its associated interfaces. So I'm having fun chewing up some old code.

Had another instrument lesson last night and it went much better than the last one. My scan was in pretty good shape. Jumped right in and did an hour in the sim. I did my first VOR RNAV approach, which is probably the easiest approach I've had to do yet. The hardest part of the approach turned out to be programming the RNAV to know about the waypoints. Once that's done, it's just a question of following the needle and watching for the TO/FROM indicator to flip. The missed approach point is just another waypoint. No timing required. Fly right to the waypoint that is the hold for the missed, and you're done. (I suspect that this is what flying a GPS approach is like, except that the GPS already knows about the waypoints.) We also did a DME arc, which I suspect that I might never use in my entire life since there are very few approaches that actually still use one, but you're supposed to know it. So it's something that I need to practice.

Hopefully next time we'll be in a real plane for a change.

January 19th, 2004
12:13pm: I'm going to need to eat something soon.

I had another instrument lesson on Saturday. It went OK, but not great. My scan kept breaking down in the simulator so the one approach I did was messy, at best. In an embarrassing moment I discovered that the simulator does, in fact, have a stall warning. And it's loud. If you get behind the power curve in this particular machine you need to really step up the power to counter the stability issues. I know that now, and no one died discovering that knowledge.

I also had to work on my VOR tracking. It's like everything I learned dribbled out of my brain and onto the sidewalk. What's up with that?

This is kind of neat probably because it crosses my two geek streams.

January 11th, 2004
9:00pm: do you know what a localizer is?
Had two back-to-back instrument lessons over this weekend with my instructor, using a sim when appropriate. Did my first ILS approach yesterday and another one today. I'm reasonably comfortable doing VOR and NDB approaches at this point as well. I also feel like I have a pretty good handle on intercepting and tracking both NDB bearings and VOR radials. My instrument scan seems to be pretty good. It still breaks down from time to time; I fixate or I omit, especially when I have to tune a radio or touch the OBS.

But all things considered, it's coming along. For our next lesson we're going to actually get in a plane and do some flying, depending on the weather. I'm really looking forward to it.

January 7th, 2004
3:40pm: where our star shows off his white trash leanings

I have to admit, I haven't been impressed with the look of a car in quite some time but the new Mustang makes my heart jump a bit. I think they did a really good job with echoing the style of the old mustang while adding a nice modern touch. 300 horsepower under the hood doesn't hurt, either.

January 5th, 2004
4:20pm: mars attacks!

This image needs a new title. Discuss.

January 4th, 2004
2:41pm: it's a new year

Back from a whirlwind tour of the northeastern united states and canada. Spent new year's with Mike in toronto which was a lot of fun. Having a GPS for these trips means you can build interesting statistics. For example:

Syracuse -> Toronto via Watertown (northern route):

276 miles total trip
0:33:00 time stopped
3:54:00 time moving
4:27:00 time total trip
71 mph moving average

Toronto -> Syracuse via Buffalo (western route)

238 miles total trip
0:20:00 time stopped
3:26:00 time moving
3:47:00 time total trip
69 mph moving average
So it looks like doing the toronto -> syracuse trip is actually faster if you go around the western side of the lake. Not counting traffic, of course.