<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: video for the web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2007/12/video-for-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2007/12/video-for-the-web/</link>
	<description>I love you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:08:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mutfak dolabı</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2007/12/video-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-153887</link>
		<dc:creator>mutfak dolabı</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=320#comment-153887</guid>
		<description>it works, even better, on the Mac. But your question is, will there be a common codec for all browser: I sure hope, if not you are right: it will be useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it works, even better, on the Mac. But your question is, will there be a common codec for all browser: I sure hope, if not you are right: it will be useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prefabrik</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2007/12/video-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-146345</link>
		<dc:creator>prefabrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=320#comment-146345</guid>
		<description>Video as an element is still a huge opportunity compared to plugins and helpers. I just hope that we can get the double win and end up with at least a free and open baseline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Video as an element is still a huge opportunity compared to plugins and helpers. I just hope that we can get the double win and end up with at least a free and open baseline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J5&#8217;s Blog &#187; Open Formats are the only way to guarantee an open web</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2007/12/video-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-57399</link>
		<dc:creator>J5&#8217;s Blog &#187; Open Formats are the only way to guarantee an open web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=320#comment-57399</guid>
		<description>[...] Open formats are essential to a free and open web. [read this post in: ar de es fr it ja ko pt ru zh-CN ]  &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Open formats are essential to a free and open web. [read this post in: ar de es fr it ja ko pt ru zh-CN ]  &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karsten Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2007/12/video-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-57386</link>
		<dc:creator>Karsten Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=320#comment-57386</guid>
		<description>Greg alerts us that the language including OGG from the HTML 5 specification has been removed ... at the concern of Apple and others:

http://gregdek.livejournal.com/20602.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg alerts us that the language including OGG from the HTML 5 specification has been removed &#8230; at the concern of Apple and others:</p>
<p><a href="http://gregdek.livejournal.com/20602.html" rel="nofollow">http://gregdek.livejournal.com/20602.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicu</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2007/12/video-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-57289</link>
		<dc:creator>nicu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=320#comment-57289</guid>
		<description>Yup, the build labeled &quot;Ubuntu&quot; works OK on Fedora. I wonder if there is any point in labeling it &quot;ubuntu&quot;, after all is a generic Linux tarball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, the build labeled &#8220;Ubuntu&#8221; works OK on Fedora. I wonder if there is any point in labeling it &#8220;ubuntu&#8221;, after all is a generic Linux tarball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2007/12/video-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-57268</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=320#comment-57268</guid>
		<description>I believe that the  tag is purposefully designed to allow fallback through multiple codecs, although having multiple copies of the same media seems ugly it&#039;s certainly better than being forced to use flash...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the  tag is purposefully designed to allow fallback through multiple codecs, although having multiple copies of the same media seems ugly it&#8217;s certainly better than being forced to use flash&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurens Holst</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2007/12/video-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-57239</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurens Holst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=320#comment-57239</guid>
		<description>There’s interesting position papers for the video workshop here:

http://www.w3.org/2007/08/video/positions/

Looking at Apple’s position paper, it looks like they are purposefully avoiding any mention of media encoding format…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s interesting position papers for the video workshop here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/2007/08/video/positions/" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/2007/08/video/positions/</a></p>
<p>Looking at Apple’s position paper, it looks like they are purposefully avoiding any mention of media encoding format…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blizzard</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2007/12/video-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-57199</link>
		<dc:creator>blizzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=320#comment-57199</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that was what I am worried about.  It&#039;s easy to say &quot;it&#039;s the operating system&#039;s responsibility, we just pass through to whatever it provides&quot; but given how inconsistent video is across operating systems I worry that it pushes that particular problem up into the browser.

Once again, video as an element is still a huge opportunity compared to plugins and helpers.  I just hope that we can get the double win and end up with at least a free and open baseline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that was what I am worried about.  It&#8217;s easy to say &#8220;it&#8217;s the operating system&#8217;s responsibility, we just pass through to whatever it provides&#8221; but given how inconsistent video is across operating systems I worry that it pushes that particular problem up into the browser.</p>
<p>Once again, video as an element is still a huge opportunity compared to plugins and helpers.  I just hope that we can get the double win and end up with at least a free and open baseline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2007/12/video-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-57193</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=320#comment-57193</guid>
		<description>Webkit on OS X uses QuickTime which in turn supports Ogg Theora / Vorbis if the XiphQT plugin (http://xiph.org/quicktime/) is installed. Right now Apple is not willing or even looking into shipping XiphQT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webkit on OS X uses QuickTime which in turn supports Ogg Theora / Vorbis if the XiphQT plugin (<a href="http://xiph.org/quicktime/" rel="nofollow">http://xiph.org/quicktime/</a>) is installed. Right now Apple is not willing or even looking into shipping XiphQT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blizzard</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2007/12/video-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-57190</link>
		<dc:creator>blizzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=320#comment-57190</guid>
		<description>Yep.  Or mp3, or other random formats that can be done in hardware.  Of course, create enough demand and maybe people will start building hardware to decode it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.  Or mp3, or other random formats that can be done in hardware.  Of course, create enough demand and maybe people will start building hardware to decode it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

