<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Beta 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/04/firefox-3-beta-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/04/firefox-3-beta-5/</link>
	<description>I love you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:08:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jiMMy</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/04/firefox-3-beta-5/comment-page-1/#comment-117571</link>
		<dc:creator>jiMMy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 19:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=350#comment-117571</guid>
		<description>Firefox 3 beta 5 on Linux

Problems
--------

1. Browser becomes unresponsive for ~10 secs, then resumes fine.
   System monitor shows uninterruptible. It mostly occurs at start
   of browsing session, almost like Firefox is updating some stuffs?

2. Rendering is very different between version 2 &amp; 3 at http://www.macgimp.org/

3. Tables are slower to scroll at http://www.willus.com/ccomp_benchmark.shtml?p6

4. Bookmark manager is slower and clumsier at moving bookmark files &amp; folders
   compared to version 2.

5. MSDN sites never stop transferring data with version 3.

6. Malware detection did not prevent site like www.antivirus-scanner.com
   from trying to install .exe on Linux?


Frankly, I do not know why fedora 9 includes Firefox 3 in its beta state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 3 beta 5 on Linux</p>
<p>Problems<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>1. Browser becomes unresponsive for ~10 secs, then resumes fine.<br />
   System monitor shows uninterruptible. It mostly occurs at start<br />
   of browsing session, almost like Firefox is updating some stuffs?</p>
<p>2. Rendering is very different between version 2 &amp; 3 at <a href="http://www.macgimp.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.macgimp.org/</a></p>
<p>3. Tables are slower to scroll at <a href="http://www.willus.com/ccomp_benchmark.shtml?p6" rel="nofollow">http://www.willus.com/ccomp_benchmark.shtml?p6</a></p>
<p>4. Bookmark manager is slower and clumsier at moving bookmark files &amp; folders<br />
   compared to version 2.</p>
<p>5. MSDN sites never stop transferring data with version 3.</p>
<p>6. Malware detection did not prevent site like <a href="http://www.antivirus-scanner.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.antivirus-scanner.com</a><br />
   from trying to install .exe on Linux?</p>
<p>Frankly, I do not know why fedora 9 includes Firefox 3 in its beta state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeRq</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/04/firefox-3-beta-5/comment-page-1/#comment-91252</link>
		<dc:creator>PeRq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=350#comment-91252</guid>
		<description>@Ryan:
Check [Improved in Beta 5!] tag in
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/3.0b5/releasenotes/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ryan:<br />
Check [Improved in Beta 5!] tag in<br />
<a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/3.0b5/releasenotes/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/3.0b5/releasenotes/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blizzard</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/04/firefox-3-beta-5/comment-page-1/#comment-89128</link>
		<dc:creator>blizzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=350#comment-89128</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that we broke it out that way, no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that we broke it out that way, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/04/firefox-3-beta-5/comment-page-1/#comment-88343</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=350#comment-88343</guid>
		<description>Are there any release notes for b4 -&gt; b5 as opposed to 2.x -&gt; 3b5 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any release notes for b4 -&gt; b5 as opposed to 2.x -&gt; 3b5 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

