<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DNS: A flag day for the Internet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/07/dns-a-flag-day-for-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/07/dns-a-flag-day-for-the-internet/</link>
	<description>I love you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:08:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ${me:-whatever} &#187; The Ultimate DNS Bug?</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/07/dns-a-flag-day-for-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-141102</link>
		<dc:creator>${me:-whatever} &#187; The Ultimate DNS Bug?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=407#comment-141102</guid>
		<description>[...] saw it on Chris Blizzard&#8217;s site and he links to the O&#8217;Reilly article about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] saw it on Chris Blizzard&#8217;s site and he links to the O&#8217;Reilly article about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Felter</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/07/dns-a-flag-day-for-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-141027</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Felter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=407#comment-141027</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a flag day since unpatched machines can still communicate with patched ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a flag day since unpatched machines can still communicate with patched ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek Alert: Dan Kaminsky on the DNS Bug of 2008 by OreillyMedia @ YouTube - mmb</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/07/dns-a-flag-day-for-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-141007</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek Alert: Dan Kaminsky on the DNS Bug of 2008 by OreillyMedia @ YouTube - mmb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=407#comment-141007</guid>
		<description>[...] via Christopher Blizzard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DNS: A flag day for the Internet? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Christopher Blizzard &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; DNS: A flag day for the Internet? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Schurter</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/07/dns-a-flag-day-for-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-140994</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Schurter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=407#comment-140994</guid>
		<description>Router vendor&#039;s should provide firmware updates to fix the DNS issue.  I use Tomato firmware, and it released an update: 

  http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato

That being said, I personally wouldn&#039;t worry about it too much.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Router vendor&#8217;s should provide firmware updates to fix the DNS issue.  I use Tomato firmware, and it released an update: </p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato" rel="nofollow">http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato</a></p>
<p>That being said, I personally wouldn&#8217;t worry about it too much.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blizzard</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/07/dns-a-flag-day-for-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-140993</link>
		<dc:creator>blizzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=407#comment-140993</guid>
		<description>djb definitely had his day with this one. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>djb definitely had his day with this one. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nossralf</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/07/dns-a-flag-day-for-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-140990</link>
		<dc:creator>nossralf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=407#comment-140990</guid>
		<description>Djbdns and PowerDNS don&#039;t suffer from this flaw, since they do proper source port randomization. It&#039;s, frankly, hilarious that Dan Bernstein has managed to write not only qmail but djbdns as well, and no one has yet to claim the $500 reward for exploits of either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Djbdns and PowerDNS don&#8217;t suffer from this flaw, since they do proper source port randomization. It&#8217;s, frankly, hilarious that Dan Bernstein has managed to write not only qmail but djbdns as well, and no one has yet to claim the $500 reward for exploits of either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: makkara</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/07/dns-a-flag-day-for-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-140987</link>
		<dc:creator>makkara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=407#comment-140987</guid>
		<description>In case you are doing something valuable, you should be using technologies like SSL anyways. In this era of availability of proper CA signed certificates you are safe from DNS attacks. 

You will instantly notice if someone gets between you and your services as the browser warns you instantly about broken certificates. In case the attacker also is able to steal someone&#039;s private keys, a little DNS haxxoring is least of your problems in any case...

And to think of it, many people have whined when Mozilla folks decided to make it less convenient to add exceptions about broken (most usually amateur self signed, but...) certificates. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you are doing something valuable, you should be using technologies like SSL anyways. In this era of availability of proper CA signed certificates you are safe from DNS attacks. </p>
<p>You will instantly notice if someone gets between you and your services as the browser warns you instantly about broken certificates. In case the attacker also is able to steal someone&#8217;s private keys, a little DNS haxxoring is least of your problems in any case&#8230;</p>
<p>And to think of it, many people have whined when Mozilla folks decided to make it less convenient to add exceptions about broken (most usually amateur self signed, but&#8230;) certificates. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

