<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: artificial sweeteners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/02/artificial-sweeteners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/02/artificial-sweeteners/</link>
	<description>I love you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:08:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Blizzard &#183; and now a study on hfcs</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/02/artificial-sweeteners/comment-page-1/#comment-254974</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Blizzard &#183; and now a study on hfcs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2116#comment-254974</guid>
		<description>[...] See also: similar results from artificial sweeteners. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See also: similar results from artificial sweeteners. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/02/artificial-sweeteners/comment-page-1/#comment-246746</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2116#comment-246746</guid>
		<description>I guess you&#039;ll enjoy the Jamie Oliver video on TED: http://www.ted.com/talks/jamie_oliver.html

It is a bit lengthy, skip forward to minute 10 for the more interesting part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you&#8217;ll enjoy the Jamie Oliver video on TED: <a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/jamie_oliver.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ted.com/talks/jamie_oliver.html</a></p>
<p>It is a bit lengthy, skip forward to minute 10 for the more interesting part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxauthority</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/02/artificial-sweeteners/comment-page-1/#comment-246714</link>
		<dc:creator>maxauthority</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2116#comment-246714</guid>
		<description>I am not saying that aspartame is unhealthy, and also the author&#039;s post was rather about gaining weight by them. Even if you don&#039;t gain weight by artificial sweeteners, but also don&#039;t loose by eating them, why not just use natural ingredients like sugar which certainly tastes better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not saying that aspartame is unhealthy, and also the author&#8217;s post was rather about gaining weight by them. Even if you don&#8217;t gain weight by artificial sweeteners, but also don&#8217;t loose by eating them, why not just use natural ingredients like sugar which certainly tastes better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeKay</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/02/artificial-sweeteners/comment-page-1/#comment-246664</link>
		<dc:creator>DeKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2116#comment-246664</guid>
		<description>P.S. From one of the comments in the article I linked:

&quot;Aspartame is perfectly safe, at least in the dosage we are getting.

Aspartame: a safety evaluation based on current use levels, regulations, and toxicological and epidemiological studies. PMID: 17828671

“The studies provide no evidence to support an association between aspartame and cancer in any tissue. The weight of existing evidence is that aspartame is safe at current levels of consumption as a nonnutritive sweetener.”

There was no conflict of interest reported in this review.

The problem might more lie in the fact that product containing aspartame are highly processed.&quot;

PPS. It is best not to use studies on rats as the gold standard when evaluating stuff like this.  There are known differences in the way we metabolize food from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. From one of the comments in the article I linked:</p>
<p>&#8220;Aspartame is perfectly safe, at least in the dosage we are getting.</p>
<p>Aspartame: a safety evaluation based on current use levels, regulations, and toxicological and epidemiological studies. PMID: 17828671</p>
<p>“The studies provide no evidence to support an association between aspartame and cancer in any tissue. The weight of existing evidence is that aspartame is safe at current levels of consumption as a nonnutritive sweetener.”</p>
<p>There was no conflict of interest reported in this review.</p>
<p>The problem might more lie in the fact that product containing aspartame are highly processed.&#8221;</p>
<p>PPS. It is best not to use studies on rats as the gold standard when evaluating stuff like this.  There are known differences in the way we metabolize food from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Wingo</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/02/artificial-sweeteners/comment-page-1/#comment-246511</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Wingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2116#comment-246511</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been enjoying your food posts quite a bit. I had seen links to the &quot;bitter truth&quot; video before, but yours happened to be the one to get me to watch it. Looking forward to checking out this one, and others :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been enjoying your food posts quite a bit. I had seen links to the &#8220;bitter truth&#8221; video before, but yours happened to be the one to get me to watch it. Looking forward to checking out this one, and others :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxauthority</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/02/artificial-sweeteners/comment-page-1/#comment-246451</link>
		<dc:creator>maxauthority</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2116#comment-246451</guid>
		<description>I just think, artificial sweeteners just takes so ugly, any time I try coke light/zero, it&#039;s so disgusting. Why not just drink/eat &quot;proper&quot; things but less of it? All those glutamate, saccharin, artificial flavoring etc. is certainly not worth it, try proper food/drinks (when possible) and you&#039;ll enjoy it much more.

Fortunately here in Europe we still have real sugar in most products, not HFCS or other sugar substitutes, although even here more and more products try to substitute sugar for (cheap) artificial sweeteners, so one has to be really careful what to buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just think, artificial sweeteners just takes so ugly, any time I try coke light/zero, it&#8217;s so disgusting. Why not just drink/eat &#8220;proper&#8221; things but less of it? All those glutamate, saccharin, artificial flavoring etc. is certainly not worth it, try proper food/drinks (when possible) and you&#8217;ll enjoy it much more.</p>
<p>Fortunately here in Europe we still have real sugar in most products, not HFCS or other sugar substitutes, although even here more and more products try to substitute sugar for (cheap) artificial sweeteners, so one has to be really careful what to buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camilla Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/02/artificial-sweeteners/comment-page-1/#comment-246408</link>
		<dc:creator>Camilla Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2116#comment-246408</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s at least one example out there (xylitol in dogs) where the sweetener triggers insulin release (a dangerous situation, since ingestion can then cause blood sugar to crash).  If it varies that significantly between dogs and humans (yes), then I expect that other animal models need to be evaluated for what the insulin response is to the sweetener, and whether that&#039;s equivalent to the human one.

(I suspect the whole thing is going to come down to the subtleties of when insulin is released, since there&#039;s some triggering for that that happens in the mouth, not the stomach.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s at least one example out there (xylitol in dogs) where the sweetener triggers insulin release (a dangerous situation, since ingestion can then cause blood sugar to crash).  If it varies that significantly between dogs and humans (yes), then I expect that other animal models need to be evaluated for what the insulin response is to the sweetener, and whether that&#8217;s equivalent to the human one.</p>
<p>(I suspect the whole thing is going to come down to the subtleties of when insulin is released, since there&#8217;s some triggering for that that happens in the mouth, not the stomach.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Dawes</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/02/artificial-sweeteners/comment-page-1/#comment-246371</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Dawes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2116#comment-246371</guid>
		<description>I love all the HFCS ads that the corn people are putting out. It&#039;s sort of like all the cigarette ads that the tobacco put out in the 80s. History does seem to repeat itself. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love all the HFCS ads that the corn people are putting out. It&#8217;s sort of like all the cigarette ads that the tobacco put out in the 80s. History does seem to repeat itself. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/02/artificial-sweeteners/comment-page-1/#comment-246330</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2116#comment-246330</guid>
		<description>I had the exact opposite experience. When I&#039;m on a diet, I *need* to drink sugar free soda (diet coke). Just drinking a lot doesn&#039;t help, I&#039;ll get hungry as hell. Any day without diet coke is the hardest day of my diet.

It makes sense, too; coffein is a known mild appetite suppressant. Also, I lost more than 30 kilos just by switching to diet coke from water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the exact opposite experience. When I&#8217;m on a diet, I *need* to drink sugar free soda (diet coke). Just drinking a lot doesn&#8217;t help, I&#8217;ll get hungry as hell. Any day without diet coke is the hardest day of my diet.</p>
<p>It makes sense, too; coffein is a known mild appetite suppressant. Also, I lost more than 30 kilos just by switching to diet coke from water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

