<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Christopher Blizzard &#187; Flickr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/category/flickr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog</link>
	<description>I love you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 20:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>a little warning about flickr feeds</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/10/a-little-warning-about-flickr-feeds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/10/a-little-warning-about-flickr-feeds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Blizzard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whoisi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I discovered the hard way that flickr uses slightly different GUIDs in its RSS and Atom feeds for the same entries.  The format looks something like this in the Atom feed: tag:flickr.com,2005:/photo/12345678 And in the RSS2 feed: tag:flickr.com,2004:/photo/12345678 &#8230; <a href="http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/10/a-little-warning-about-flickr-feeds/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night I discovered the hard way that flickr uses slightly different GUIDs in its RSS and Atom feeds for the same entries.  The format looks something like this in the <a href="http://api.flickr.com/services/feeds/photos_public.gne?id=76418115@N00&amp;lang=en-us&amp;format=atom">Atom feed</a>:</p>
<p>tag:flickr.com,2005:/photo/12345678</p>
<p>And in the <a href="http://api.flickr.com/services/feeds/photos_public.gne?id=76418115@N00&amp;lang=en-us&amp;format=rss_200">RSS2 feed</a>:</p>
<p>tag:flickr.com,2004:/photo/12345678</p>
<p>Notice the difference?  The photo ID is the same, the tag (a year, probably?) is slightly different.</p>
<p>I converted everyone&#8217;s Flickr feeds on <a href="http://whoisi.com">whoisi</a> to use RSS2 instead of Atom because the RSS2 feeds contain the thumbnail as part of the <a href="http://twitter.com/chrisblizzard/statuses/963255732">&lt;media:thumbnail&gt;</a> element instead of having to make a separate call to the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/services/api/">Flickr API</a>.  This makes things like preview and adding new sites super-fast and it will probably let me remove a thousand lines of python and JS from the whoisi source code.</p>
<p>But the side effect was that with new IDs every entry looked new.  And I suddenly had a few thousand new entries in my <a href="http://whoisi.com/unseen">unseen page on whoisi</a>.  I spent some time last night and this morning cleaning up the database to reflect the proper GUIDs in flickr feeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/10/a-little-warning-about-flickr-feeds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

