<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Christopher Blizzard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog</link>
	<description>I love you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:08:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on bringing the first 3D HTML5 video to the web with Firefox, NVIDIA and Youtube by gl</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2011/05/bringing-the-first-3d-html5-video-to-the-web-with-firefox-nvidia-and-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-312571</link>
		<dc:creator>gl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2550#comment-312571</guid>
		<description>How about supporting the various passive FPR (Fixed Patterned Retarder) displays that have been out for a while (eg. Zalman and LG PC monitors, various laptops)?  These only require a horizontal interlacing of the two views.  And of course all the other types YouTube already supports, eg. anaglyph, checkerboard etc.

I would very much like to see full stereoscopic support in HTML5 asap.  That includes a &#039;depth&#039; property for text.  I&#039;m a stereo artist &amp; developer - I&#039;m keen to develop an entirely stereoscopic website (including video, images and text), including some compositing of elements.  Full HTML5 stereo support, across browsers, can&#039;t come soon enough for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about supporting the various passive FPR (Fixed Patterned Retarder) displays that have been out for a while (eg. Zalman and LG PC monitors, various laptops)?  These only require a horizontal interlacing of the two views.  And of course all the other types YouTube already supports, eg. anaglyph, checkerboard etc.</p>
<p>I would very much like to see full stereoscopic support in HTML5 asap.  That includes a &#8216;depth&#8217; property for text.  I&#8217;m a stereo artist &amp; developer &#8211; I&#8217;m keen to develop an entirely stereoscopic website (including video, images and text), including some compositing of elements.  Full HTML5 stereo support, across browsers, can&#8217;t come soon enough for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on disabling websockets for firefox 4 by Vemos como no todo es HTML5 y los principales cambios que incorpora. &#171; Comentario Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/12/disabling-websockets-for-firefox-4/comment-page-1/#comment-312322</link>
		<dc:creator>Vemos como no todo es HTML5 y los principales cambios que incorpora. &#171; Comentario Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2507#comment-312322</guid>
		<description>[...] tan conocidos como Opera o Firefox que habían dado soporte a dicha interfaz de desarrollo, hayan tenido que dar marcha atrás y eliminar el soporte de sus navegadores. Este tipo de sucesos no se están produciendo con [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tan conocidos como Opera o Firefox que habían dado soporte a dicha interfaz de desarrollo, hayan tenido que dar marcha atrás y eliminar el soporte de sus navegadores. Este tipo de sucesos no se están produciendo con [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on our first 24 hour race by Akpm</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2011/03/our-first-24-hour-race/comment-page-1/#comment-310638</link>
		<dc:creator>Akpm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2512#comment-310638</guid>
		<description>Cool. Apparently oe headlights just don&#039;t cut it on a track at nights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. Apparently oe headlights just don&#8217;t cut it on a track at nights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on bringing the first 3D HTML5 video to the web with Firefox, NVIDIA and Youtube by Vic Dinovici</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2011/05/bringing-the-first-3d-html5-video-to-the-web-with-firefox-nvidia-and-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-308163</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Dinovici</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 02:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2550#comment-308163</guid>
		<description>I really believe YouTube are the pioneers of implementing HTML5. Glad to hear new things happen :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really believe YouTube are the pioneers of implementing HTML5. Glad to hear new things happen :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on disabling websockets for firefox 4 by Browser and Feature Detection: Make your Website look Great Everywhere</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/12/disabling-websockets-for-firefox-4/comment-page-1/#comment-304506</link>
		<dc:creator>Browser and Feature Detection: Make your Website look Great Everywhere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 18:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2507#comment-304506</guid>
		<description>[...] to sites that use features that break pages between browser releases. An example of this was Firefox 4 disabling Websockets between Beta 7 and 8 due to security reasons. It&#8217;s an extremely frustrating experience for both users and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to sites that use features that break pages between browser releases. An example of this was Firefox 4 disabling Websockets between Beta 7 and 8 due to security reasons. It&#8217;s an extremely frustrating experience for both users and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on intellectual honesty and html5 by Ile HTML 5 w HTML 5 &#8211; co właściwie pokazało Apple? &#171; marcoos.techblog</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/06/intellectual-honesty-and-html5/comment-page-4/#comment-304307</link>
		<dc:creator>Ile HTML 5 w HTML 5 &#8211; co właściwie pokazało Apple? &#171; marcoos.techblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2351#comment-304307</guid>
		<description>[...] tu zagłębiać się w ideologię (choć, szczerze mówiąc, całkowicie zgadzam się tutaj z Chrisem Blizzardem) &#8211; chcę się skupić wyłącznie na kwestiach [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tu zagłębiać się w ideologię (choć, szczerze mówiąc, całkowicie zgadzam się tutaj z Chrisem Blizzardem) &#8211; chcę się skupić wyłącznie na kwestiach [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on today in crazy right wing email I get by William Frantz</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/06/today-in-crazy-right-wing-email-i-get/comment-page-1/#comment-303877</link>
		<dc:creator>William Frantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2407#comment-303877</guid>
		<description>[Excuse the thread digging.  Pet Peeve Alert!]

Words have meanings.  CO2 is a green house gas but it&#039;s not a pollutant.  Calling CO2 a pollutant is like calling water and sunshine pollutants.  Water, sunshine or a peanut can kill but they are not pollutants.

There might be good reasons to curb the production of CO2 (or H2O for that matter) but don&#039;t call them pollutants just to engender public sympathy from dolts who skipped science class.  What&#039;s next?  Call it Nazi gas?  Commie fumes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Excuse the thread digging.  Pet Peeve Alert!]</p>
<p>Words have meanings.  CO2 is a green house gas but it&#8217;s not a pollutant.  Calling CO2 a pollutant is like calling water and sunshine pollutants.  Water, sunshine or a peanut can kill but they are not pollutants.</p>
<p>There might be good reasons to curb the production of CO2 (or H2O for that matter) but don&#8217;t call them pollutants just to engender public sympathy from dolts who skipped science class.  What&#8217;s next?  Call it Nazi gas?  Commie fumes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on mozilla embedding overview &amp; meetup notes by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2008/04/mozilla-embedding-overview-meetup-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-303169</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=359#comment-303169</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not quite sure you&#039;ll get this, but I&#039;m getting desperate.

After much research I&#039;m still at a loss for the best way to embed a web browser in a GTK application. I have a Gtk::Layout (GtkLayout in C) in which I would like to place a web browser with no end user navigation outside of following links within the page displayed (i.e. no toolbars, status bars, file menu, etc...). The web pages specifically are written using the ExtJS framework with PHP controllers.

I tried using Gecko, but I keep running into dead ends saying &quot;Use XUL for all new embedding!&quot; and then I find no way of embedding XUL in my GtkLayout. So I tried your gtkmozembed widget which is incompatible with Gtk+ 3 and I&#039;d rather not rewrite your code for a simple web browser ( not even a full browser, just a window! ) Is there any chance you still maintain any of this, or know anyone who does, or know how to embed XUL into a gtk widget, or have ANY suggestions? If so I would greatly appreciated it.

I&#039;ve posted  a stackoverflow question with more details if you&#039;re interested...
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7771942/webkitgtk-wont-cant-find-post-information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure you&#8217;ll get this, but I&#8217;m getting desperate.</p>
<p>After much research I&#8217;m still at a loss for the best way to embed a web browser in a GTK application. I have a Gtk::Layout (GtkLayout in C) in which I would like to place a web browser with no end user navigation outside of following links within the page displayed (i.e. no toolbars, status bars, file menu, etc&#8230;). The web pages specifically are written using the ExtJS framework with PHP controllers.</p>
<p>I tried using Gecko, but I keep running into dead ends saying &#8220;Use XUL for all new embedding!&#8221; and then I find no way of embedding XUL in my GtkLayout. So I tried your gtkmozembed widget which is incompatible with Gtk+ 3 and I&#8217;d rather not rewrite your code for a simple web browser ( not even a full browser, just a window! ) Is there any chance you still maintain any of this, or know anyone who does, or know how to embed XUL into a gtk widget, or have ANY suggestions? If so I would greatly appreciated it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve posted  a stackoverflow question with more details if you&#8217;re interested&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7771942/webkitgtk-wont-cant-find-post-information" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7771942/webkitgtk-wont-cant-find-post-information</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on disabling websockets for firefox 4 by Hack all the world - BEAST Attack - Focusecurity.Org</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/12/disabling-websockets-for-firefox-4/comment-page-1/#comment-302499</link>
		<dc:creator>Hack all the world - BEAST Attack - Focusecurity.Org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 03:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2507#comment-302499</guid>
		<description>[...] This version of WebSockets was shipped in some browsers and then largely disabled (for instance here) because of a vunerability published by David Huang, Eric Chen, Adam Barth, Collin Jackson, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This version of WebSockets was shipped in some browsers and then largely disabled (for instance here) because of a vunerability published by David Huang, Eric Chen, Adam Barth, Collin Jackson, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on disabling websockets for firefox 4 by Developing with Browser- and Feature-Detection » SitePoint</title>
		<link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/12/disabling-websockets-for-firefox-4/comment-page-1/#comment-302409</link>
		<dc:creator>Developing with Browser- and Feature-Detection » SitePoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=2507#comment-302409</guid>
		<description>[...] changed a frustrating experience both for users and developers alike. An example of this was Firefox 4 disabling Websockets between Beta 7 and 8 due to security reasons.Chrome which is also very fast in adopting new HTML5 standards has recently [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] changed a frustrating experience both for users and developers alike. An example of this was Firefox 4 disabling Websockets between Beta 7 and 8 due to security reasons.Chrome which is also very fast in adopting new HTML5 standards has recently [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

